Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-75-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-75-2024
Original full-length article
 | 
23 Feb 2024
Original full-length article |  | 23 Feb 2024

Do one-stage indications predict success following two-stage arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection?

Michael M. Kheir, Christopher G. Anderson, Yu-Fen Chiu, and Alberto V. Carli

Related authors

Changing the definition of treatment success alters treatment outcomes in periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eytan M. Debbi, Tyler Khilnani, Ioannis Gkiatas, Yu-Fen Chiu, Andy O. Miller, Michael W. Henry, and Alberto V. Carli
J. Bone Joint Infect., 9, 127–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-127-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dalbavancin is thermally stable at clinically relevant temperatures against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus
Aaron K. Hoyt, Patrick Lawler, Mathias Bostrom, Alberto V. Carli, and Ashley E. Levack
J. Bone Joint Infect., 8, 175–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-175-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-175-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Prosthesis-related infections | Topic: Surgery
Outcomes of the gastrocnemius flap performed by orthopaedic surgeons in salvage revision knee arthroplasty
Robert Allan McCulloch, Amirul Adlan, Scott Evans, Michael Parry, Jonathan Stevenson, and Lee Jeys
J. Bone Joint Infect., 6, 425–432, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-425-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-425-2021, 2021
Short summary
Long-term outcome of two-stage revision surgery after hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: an observational study
Yorrick P. Bourgonjen, J. Fred F. Hooning van Duyvenbode, Bruce van Dijk, F. Ruben H. A. Nurmohamed, Ewout S. Veltman, H. Charles Vogely, and Bart C. H. van der Wal
J. Bone Joint Infect., 6, 379–387, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-379-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-379-2021, 2021
Short summary
Timing of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for early post-surgical hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) does not affect 1-year re-revision rates: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
Barry van der Ende, Jakob van Oldenrijk, Max Reijman, Peter D. Croughs, Liza N. van Steenbergen, Jan A. N. Verhaar, and P. Koen Bos
J. Bone Joint Infect., 6, 329–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-329-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-329-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Baker, P., Petheram, T. G., Kurtz, S., Konttinen, Y. T., Gregg, P., and Deehan, D.: Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: Comparison of single versus two-stage revision. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA, 21, 2713–2720, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7, 2013. 
Bialecki, J., Bucsi, L., Fernando, N., Foguet, P., Guo, S., Haddad, F., Hansen, E., Janvari, K., Jones, S., Keogh, P., McHale, S., Molloy, R., Mont, M. A., Morgan-Jones, R., Ohlmeier, M., Saldaña, A., Sodhi, N., Toms, A., Walker, R., and Zahar, A.: Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, One Stage Exchange: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections, J. Arthroplasty, 34, S421–S426, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.026, 2019. 
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., and MacKenzie, C. R.: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation, J. Chron. Dis., 40, 373–383, 1987. 
Choi, H.-R., Kwon, Y.-M., Freiberg, A. A., and Malchau, H.: Comparison of one-stage revision with antibiotic cement versus two-stage revision results for infected total hip arthroplasty, J. Arthroplasty, 28, 66–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.037, 2013. 
Dombrowski, M. E., Wilson, A. E., Wawrose, R. A., O'Malley, M. J., Urish, K. L., and Klatt, B. A.: A Low Percentage of Patients Satisfy Typical Indications for Single-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection, Clin. Orthop. Relat. R., 478, 1780–1786, https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001243, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
Researchers in 2018 suggested guidelines to decide if a single surgery (one-stage exchange) could be used to treat a joint implant infection. We wanted to see how many patients met guidelines and if they had better outcomes. Very few patients with joint implant infections met guidelines for a single surgery. Also, being in good general health with a known cause of infection did not guarantee better results. This supports the need for a bigger study comparing one- and two-step treatments.