Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-75-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-75-2024
Original full-length article
 | 
23 Feb 2024
Original full-length article |  | 23 Feb 2024

Do one-stage indications predict success following two-stage arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection?

Michael M. Kheir, Christopher G. Anderson, Yu-Fen Chiu, and Alberto V. Carli

Viewed

Total article views: 1,018 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
823 151 44 1,018 49 83
  • HTML: 823
  • PDF: 151
  • XML: 44
  • Total: 1,018
  • BibTeX: 49
  • EndNote: 83
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 981 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 981 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 01 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Researchers in 2018 suggested guidelines to decide if a single surgery (one-stage exchange) could be used to treat a joint implant infection. We wanted to see how many patients met guidelines and if they had better outcomes. Very few patients with joint implant infections met guidelines for a single surgery. Also, being in good general health with a known cause of infection did not guarantee better results. This supports the need for a bigger study comparing one- and two-step treatments.
Share