Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-1-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-1-2022
Original full-length article
 | 
06 Jan 2022
Original full-length article |  | 06 Jan 2022

Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection. A retrospective single-center experience

Karsten D. Ottink, Stefan J. Gelderman, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Joris J. W. Ploegmakers, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans, and Paul C. Jutte

Viewed

Total article views: 968 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
742 180 46 968 34 43
  • HTML: 742
  • PDF: 180
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 968
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 911 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 911 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
A low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may be difficult to diagnose, and nuclear imaging could help in the diagnosis. However, its diagnostic value is unclear. We retrospectively evaluated this diagnostic value. We conclude that in patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms and a low a priori chance of PJI based on clinical evaluation, nuclear imaging is of no clear added value in diagnosing a PJI.