This study validated three models for predicting infection after hip and knee replacement surgery. By analyzing data from 2684 patients in the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain, we found that the models developed by Tan, Del Toro, and Bülow effectively identified high-risk patients. These models can be used to enhance preoperative counseling and to tailor infection prevention measures individually, potentially improving outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

This study investigates sex-related differences in periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJIs) after total joint arthroplasty. A systematic review of nine studies reveals a higher risk of infectious complications in males compared to females, as indicated by statistically significant findings in half of the studies. This underscores the need for ongoing sex-related analysis to enhance evidence and insights in the field of PJIs.

This retrospective case-matched study evaluated males and females with staphylococcal PJI (periprosthetic joint infection) treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty. We matched 156 males and females for age, type of staphylococcal infection, and joint involved. We compared clinical parameters related to presentation, treatment, and outcome. We did not find a statistically significant difference in outcome between males and females treated with the same surgical approach at our institution.

Culture-negative (CN) prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) present significant challenges for clinicians. While previous retrospective analyses have been conducted, inconsistencies in inclusion criteria and treatment success measures limit the opportunity for direct comparisons and use in guiding clinical practice. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes of CN with culture-positive (CP) cases in a large multicentre prospective cohort and demonstrated improved overall outcomes in CN PJI.

Areas in orthopedics, such as spinal metastasis and sarcomas, have shown benefits of concentrated care in specialized centers. Currently in the US, no such centers exist for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We established a PJI center and review our first-year experience. Additionally, we note the complexity and volume of referrals, in addition to the abundant opportunities for research that referral centers provide. PJI centers are feasible and can improve PJI care.