Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-59-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-59-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Wound drainage after arthroplasty and prediction of acute prosthetic joint infection: prospective data from a multicentre cohort study using a telemonitoring app
Henk Scheper
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Rachid Mahdad
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
Brenda Elzer
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Claudia Löwik
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Wierd Zijlstra
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
Taco Gosens
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
Joris C. T. van der Lugt
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Reinier Haga Orthopaedic Centre, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands
Robert J. P. van der Wal
Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Rudolf W. Poolman
Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Matthijs P. Somford
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
Paul C. Jutte
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Pieter K. Bos
Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Richard E. Zwaan
Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Advanced Data Management, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Rob G. H. H. Nelissen
Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Leo G. Visser
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Mark G. J. de Boer
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
A full list of authors appears at the end of the paper.
Related authors
Jaap L. J. Hanssen, Robert J. P. van der Wal, Henrica M. J. van der Linden, Joffrey van Prehn, Henk Scheper, and Mark G. J. de Boer
J. Bone Joint Infect., 9, 149–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-149-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-149-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Some patients with an infection of their orthopedic implant use lifelong daily antibiotics. Our research, however, suggests that it might be safe to stop after 2 to 3 years. Furthermore, we found that it is probably safe to use a lower dosage of antibiotics than normally used for these infections. We performed this study by retrospectively analyzing electronic patient files from all patients we treated in our hospital with suppressive antibiotics.
Anas Zouitni, Erlangga Yusuf, Jakob van Oldenrijk, Tjebbe Hagenaars, Peter D. Croughs, P. Koen Bos, Denise Eygendaal, and Ewout S. Veltman
J. Bone Joint Infect., 11, 431–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-11-431-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-11-431-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the diagnostic value of sonication fluid culture (SFC) as an adjunct to conventional diagnostic methods for fracture-related infection (FRI). SFC improves pathogen detection and contributes to more accurate diagnosis of FRI. In approximately 6 % to 16 % of confirmed FRI cases, SFC influenced FRI management. These findings support the routine use of SFC alongside standard tissue cultures, with adequate sampling according to protocol.
Ruben Scholten, Gerjon Hannink, Matthijs P. Somford, and Job L. C. van Susante
J. Bone Joint Infect., 10, 207–215, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-207-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-207-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the effectiveness of repeated debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for early periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after total joint arthroplasty. It shows that repeated DAIR procedures may achieve over 75 % success, which indicates that this approach may have value in managing early PJIs after weighing the benefits and risks of repeated DAIR against implant removal for each patient.
Seung-Jae Yoon, Paul C. Jutte, Alex Soriano, Ricardo Sousa, Wierd P. Zijlstra, and Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
J. Bone Joint Infect., 9, 231–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-231-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-231-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study validated three models for predicting infection after hip and knee replacement surgery. By analyzing data from 2684 patients in the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain, we found that the models developed by Tan, Del Toro, and Bülow effectively identified high-risk patients. These models can be used to enhance preoperative counseling and to tailor infection prevention measures individually, potentially improving outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
Jaap L. J. Hanssen, Robert J. P. van der Wal, Henrica M. J. van der Linden, Joffrey van Prehn, Henk Scheper, and Mark G. J. de Boer
J. Bone Joint Infect., 9, 149–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-149-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-149-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Some patients with an infection of their orthopedic implant use lifelong daily antibiotics. Our research, however, suggests that it might be safe to stop after 2 to 3 years. Furthermore, we found that it is probably safe to use a lower dosage of antibiotics than normally used for these infections. We performed this study by retrospectively analyzing electronic patient files from all patients we treated in our hospital with suppressive antibiotics.
Jorrit Willem Adriaan Schoenmakers, Rosanne de Boer, Lilli Gard, Greetje Anna Kampinga, Marleen van Oosten, Jan Maarten van Dijl, Paulus Christiaan Jutte, and Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
J. Bone Joint Infect., 8, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In a first evaluation, the accuracy of a novel multiplex PCR (polymerase chain reaction) panel for rapid detection of pathogens in patients with a clinical suspicion of acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is assessed. Clear benefit is seen in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute prosthetic joint infection. This indicates that the panel allows for fast tailoring of antibiotics and may prompt the surgeon for surgical lavage in doubtful clinical cases.
Thomas J. A. van Schaik, Lex D. de Jong, Maurits P. A. van Meer, Jon H. M. Goosen, and Matthijs P. Somford
J. Bone Joint Infect., 7, 259–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-259-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-259-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This systematic review presents the results regarding the concordance rate between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative tissue culturing in patients with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The included studies had heterogeneous results and were at a high risk of bias. Higher-quality future research may help to better understand the true concordance between these cultures. This may result in better guidance for orthopedic surgeons regarding the treatment of patients with PJI.
Lotje A. Hoogervorst, Lindsey S. op de Coul, Arghya Ray, Pieter Bas de Witte, and Mark G. J. de Boer
J. Bone Joint Infect., 7, 241–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-241-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-241-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A Madura foot caused by the fungus Madurella mycetomatis is a rare condition in non-endemic countries, but should be included in the differential diagnosis in case of soft tissue swellings of the foot in patients who have been in mycetomatis-endemic regions, more specifically in immunocompromised patients, who are at risk of developing a (more severe) mycetoma infection. Adequate treatment is needed to prevent the progression and recurrence of a Madura foot.
Karsten D. Ottink, Stefan J. Gelderman, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Joris J. W. Ploegmakers, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans, and Paul C. Jutte
J. Bone Joint Infect., 7, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may be difficult to diagnose, and nuclear imaging could help in the diagnosis. However, its diagnostic value is unclear. We retrospectively evaluated this diagnostic value. We conclude that in patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms and a low a priori chance of PJI based on clinical evaluation, nuclear imaging is of no clear added value in diagnosing a PJI.
Tom A. G. Van Vugt, Jeffrey Heidotting, Jacobus J. Arts, Joris J. W. Ploegmakers, Paul C. Jutte, and Jan A. P. Geurts
J. Bone Joint Infect., 6, 413–421, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Chronic osteomyelitis is a bone infection and was treated with a combination of antibiotics and two surgeries. With the introduction of the biomaterial S53P4 bioactive glass, these infections can be treated with antibiotics and one surgery. This study shows 85 % success in the treatment of these bone infections. Together with the fundamentally different antibacterial mechanisms without antibiotic resistance, S53P4 bioactive glass is recommendable for the treatment of these infections.
Barry van der Ende, Jakob van Oldenrijk, Max Reijman, Peter D. Croughs, Liza N. van Steenbergen, Jan A. N. Verhaar, and P. Koen Bos
J. Bone Joint Infect., 6, 329–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-329-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-329-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Infection after total hip (THA) or total knee (TKA) arthroplasty can be treated by a so-called DAIR procedure within 4 weeks after surgery. However, could a DAIR be successful up to 3 months? In the Dutch Arthroplasty Register we found a re-revision rate of 8% within 4 weeks after THA and 9% re-revisions between 4 and 12 weeks. After TKA we found 9% re-revisions within 4 weeks and 17%
failuresafter 4–12 weeks. We show no difference for DAIRs performed within 4 weeks or between 4 and 12 weeks.
Cited articles
Almeida, R. P., Mokete, L., Sikhauli, N., Sekeitto, A. R., and Pietrzak,
J.: The draining surgical wound post total hip and knee arthroplasty: what
are my options? A narrative review, EFORT Open Rev., 6, 872–880,
https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200054, 2021.
Armstrong, K. A., Coyte, P. C., Brown, M., Beber, B., and Semple, J. L.:
Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits
Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA Surg., 152,
622–627, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0111, 2017.
Chua, M. E., Saunders, M. A., Bowlin, P. R., Ming, J. M., Lopes, R. I.,
Farhat, W. A., and Dos Santos, J.: Impact of smartphone digital photography,
email, and media communication on emergency room visits post-hypospadias
repair, CUAJ-Can. Urol. Assoc., 11, E134–E137, https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4170, 2017.
Gray, R. T., Sut, M. K., Badger, S. A., and Harvey, C. F.: Post-operative
telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients, Ulster Med. J.,
79, 76–79, 2010.
Hiligsmann, M., Cooper, C., Arden, N., Boers, M., Branco, J. C., Luisa
Brandi, M., Bruyere, O., Guillemin, F., Hochberg, M. C., Hunter, D. J.,
Kanis, J. A., Kvien, T. K., Laslop, A., Pelletier, J. P., Pinto, D.,
Reiter-Niesert, S., Rizzoli, R., Rovati, L. C., Severens, J. L., Silverman,
S., Tsouderos, Y., Tugwell, P., and Reginster, J. Y.: Health economics in
the field of osteoarthritis: an expert's consensus paper from the European
Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis
(ESCEO), Semin. Arthritis Rheu., 43, 303–313,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.07.003, 2013.
Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., Watson, H., Schmier, J. K., and Parvizi, J.: Economic
burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, J.
Arthroplasty, 27, 61–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022, 2012.
Lowik, C. A. M., Wagenaar, F. C., van der Weegen, W., Poolman, R. W.,
Nelissen, R., Bulstra, S. K., Pronk, Y., Vermeulen, K. M.,
Wouthuyzen-Bakker, M., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Stevens, M., and Jutte, P.
C.: LEAK study: design of a nationwide randomised controlled trial to find
the best way to treat wound leakage after primary hip and knee arthroplasty,
BMJ Open, 7, e018673, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018673, 2017.
McNally, M., Sousa, R., Wouthuyzen-Bakker, M., Chen, A. F., Soriano, A.,
Vogely, H. C., Clauss, M., Higuera, C. A., and Trebse, R.: The EBJIS
definition of periprosthetic joint infection, Bone Joint J., 103, 18–25,
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1, 2021.
Parvizi, J., Gehrke, T., and Chen, A. F.: Proceedings of the International
Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection, Bone Joint J., 95, 1450–1452,
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135, 2013.
Patel, V. P., Walsh, M., Sehgal, B., Preston, C., DeWal, H., and Di Cesare,
P. E.: Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total
hip and knee arthroplasty, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 89, 33–38,
https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00163, 2007.
Sanger, P. C., Hartzler, A., Han, S. M., Armstrong, C. A., Stewart, M. R.,
Lordon, R. J., Lober, W. B., and Evans, H. L.: Patient perspectives on
post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile
health solution, PLoS One, 9, e114016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114016, 2014.
Scheper, H., Derogee, R., Mahdad, R., van der Wal, R. J. P., Nelissen, R.,
Visser, L. G., and de Boer, M. G. J.: A mobile app for postoperative wound
care after arthroplasty: Ease of use and perceived usefulness, Int. J. Med.
Inform., 129, 75–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.010, 2019.
Wagenaar, F. B. M., Lowik, C. A. M., Zahar, A., Jutte, P. C., Gehrke, T.,
and Parvizi, J.: Persistent Wound Drainage After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A
Narrative Review, J. Arthroplasty, 34, 175–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.034,
2019.
Weiss, A. P. and Krackow, K. A.: Persistent wound drainage after primary
total knee arthroplasty, J. Arthroplasty, 8, 285–289, 1993.
Zimmerli, W., Trampuz, A., and Ochsner, P. E.: Prosthetic-joint infections,
N. Engl. J. Med., 351, 1645–1654, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040181, 2004.
Short summary
The relation between postoperative wound leakage and occurrence of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after arthroplasty has not been investigated in a prospective study. We performed a large cohort study in which 1019 patients, after arthroplasty, recorded their wound drainage status in a wound care app during 30 postoperative days. Risk factors for wound drainage were identified. Moderate to heavy wound leakage in the third postoperative week was strongly associated with the occurrence of PJI.
The relation between postoperative wound leakage and occurrence of a prosthetic joint infection...