Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-51-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-51-2022
Viewpoint
 | 
01 Mar 2022
Viewpoint |  | 01 Mar 2022

Has the time come for regional periprosthetic joint infection centers in the United States? A first-year experience

Murillo Adrados, Michael M. Valenzuela, Bryan D. Springer, Susan M. Odum, Thomas K. Fehring, and Jesse E. Otero

Viewed

Total article views: 1,188 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
901 223 64 1,188 77 127
  • HTML: 901
  • PDF: 223
  • XML: 64
  • Total: 1,188
  • BibTeX: 77
  • EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,137 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,137 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Areas in orthopedics, such as spinal metastasis and sarcomas, have shown benefits of concentrated care in specialized centers. Currently in the US, no such centers exist for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We established a PJI center and review our first-year experience. Additionally, we note the complexity and volume of referrals, in addition to the abundant opportunities for research that referral centers provide. PJI centers are feasible and can improve PJI care.
Share