Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
JBJI
Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-51-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-51-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
Original full-length article
 | 
07 Mar 2025
Original full-length article |  | 07 Mar 2025

Postoperative antibiotic treatment does not lower re-revision rate in presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures – a matched cohort study

Sebastian Simon, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Susana Gardete Hartmann, Jennyfer A. Mitterer, Sujeesh Sebastian, Stephanie Huber, Bernhard J. H. Frank, and Jochen G. Hofstaetter

Viewed

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
34 6 1 41 0 0
  • HTML: 34
  • PDF: 6
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 41
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 41 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
We compared the re-revision rates in rTHA and rTKA (revison total hip and knee arthroplasty) with and without AB (antibiotic) treatment in patients with UPICs (unexpected positive intraoperative cultures). The re-revision rate between the AB group and the non-AB group was similar. Postoperative AB treatment did not result in a decreased re-revision rate in patients with UPICs in presumed aseptic rTHA and rTKA. Patients with pathogens classified as a likely contaminant can be safely ignored.

Read more
Share