Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-479-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-479-2025
Original full-length article
 | 
25 Nov 2025
Original full-length article |  | 25 Nov 2025

Modular megaprostheses yield high any-type failure rate but acceptable infection control rate in patients with chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection and severe bone loss: a single-center experience

Vladislav Bartak, David Jahoda, Michal Benes, Tobias Judl, Matej Mazura, and Petr Fulin

Viewed

Total article views: 370 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
284 64 22 370 8 13
  • HTML: 284
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 370
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 345 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 345 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
This single-center retrospective study focused on the utility of modular megaprostheses in patients with chronic hip or knee periprosthetic joint infections. Among the 61 included patients, 37.7 % experienced any type of failure, with infection recurrence being the most common reason. While infection control was acceptable, the rates of any-type failure were high. Moreover, patients classified as McPherson host grade C, representing compromised hosts, are at greater risk of experiencing failure.
Share