Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
JBJI
Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-347-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-347-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
Review
 | 
01 Oct 2025
Review |  | 01 Oct 2025

Single- versus two-stage revision surgery in the case of fracture-related infection: a systematic review

Jonathan Sliepen, Michelle A. S. Buijs, Jolien Onsea, Geertje A. M. Govaert, Frank F. A. IJpma, Jean-Paul P. M. de Vries, Bart C. H. Van der Wal, Charalampos Zalavras, and Willem-Jan Metsemakers

Viewed

Total article views: 23 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
22 1 0 23 0 0 0
  • HTML: 22
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 23
  • Supplement: 0
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 23 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 23 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
This review assessed the effectiveness of single- and two-stage procedures for treating long-bone fracture-related infections, focusing on unhealed fractures without critical-sized bone defects. A total of 35 studies with 985 patients showed bone-healing rates of 80% for single-stage procedures and 77% for two-stage procedures. Infection eradication rates were 87% for single-stage approaches and 81% for two-stage approaches. The current evidence is inconclusive and lacks sufficient data to favor either approach.
Read more
Share