Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-335-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-335-2025
Letter
 | 
05 Sep 2025
Letter |  | 05 Sep 2025

Comment on “Differential synovial fluid white blood cell count for the diagnosis of chronic peri-prosthetic joint infection – a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Sabater-Martos et al. (2025)

Pim W. van Egmond, Olav P. van der Jagt, and Jesse W. P. Kuiper

Viewed

Total article views: 29 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
27 1 1 29 1 4
  • HTML: 27
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 29
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 29 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 29 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Sep 2025
Short summary
Many studies evaluating infection tests after joint replacement focus only on patients who have surgery, but not all painful joints are operated on. This can lead to biased results. Our comment highlights this issue and suggests that including patients who do not have surgery but are monitored over time can give a clearer picture. This helps ensure that infection tests are more accurate when used in everyday medical practice, not just in surgical cases.
Share