Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-151-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-151-2023
Original full-length article
 | 
09 May 2023
Original full-length article |  | 09 May 2023

Is ultrasound-guided hip aspiration more successful than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection?

Emily A. Treu, Daniel M. Cushman, John C. Wheelwright, Brenna E. Blackburn, Masaru Teramoto, and Michael J. Archibeck

Viewed

Total article views: 374 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
258 82 34 374 26 31
  • HTML: 258
  • PDF: 82
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 374
  • BibTeX: 26
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 358 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 358 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 12 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Our study showed that ultrasound-guided aspiration of a total hip arthroplasty was more commonly successful and resulted in fewer dry aspirations than fluoroscopy. Ultrasound-guided aspiration yielded a larger volume of fluid than fluoroscopy, even when excluding dry aspirations. Ultrasound was more sensitive than fluoroscopy in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) using culture results only and 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria.