59 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Do Prosthetic Joint Infections Worsen the Functional Ambulatory Outcome of Patients with Joint Replacements? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study I. Mur et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120872
2. Chlorhexidine Wound Irrigation for the Prevention of Early Surgical Site Infection in Orthopaedic Surgeries in Resource-Limited Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial K. Ugwoke et al. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73235
3. Does a Specific Sequential Combination of Antiseptic Solutions for Chemical Debridement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improve Outcomes vs. Solution Alone? An In Vivo Study M. Márquez-Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121225
4. C-Reactive Protein as a Predictor of the Success of Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention in Patients With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A 17-year Retrospective Study of 2 Major Joint Arthroplasty Centers C. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2025.101799
5. Extensive skin necrosis after periprosthetic knee infection: a case that highlights the possibility of complications induced by low-molecular-weight heparin H. Fonte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-235-2021
6. Lower Rates of Reoperation Following Partial or Complete Revision Arthroplasty Compared to Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Early Postoperative and Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Hip Infection J. Bourget-Murray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.054
7. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention after revision arthroplasty K. Veerman et al. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1264.R1
8. What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis? V. Desai et al. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00124
9. Fellowship Training in Arthroplasty Improves Treatment Success of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Knee Infections N. Tubin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101378
10. Local antibiotic treatment with calcium sulfate as carrier material improves the outcome of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedures for periprosthetic joint infections after hip arthroplasty – a retrospective study K. Reinisch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-11-2022
11. A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty H. Mian et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00136-5
12. Incidence, functional outcomes and cure rate of hematogenous infection in a 2,498 Total Knee Arthroplasties cohort D. Pérez‐Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00656-2
13. Lyme Prosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty M. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.20.00898
14. Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Infection K. McCormick et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.057
15. An Insight Into Lyme Prosthetic Joint Infection in Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review M. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00191
16. Risk factors affect success rate of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in periprosthetic joint infection Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-020-00056-2
17. CORR Insights®: For Patients With Acute PJI Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention, What Factors are Associated With Systemic Sepsis and Recurrent or Persistent Infection in Septic Patients? M. Kheir https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002216
18. Economic burden of surgical management of surgical site infections following hip and knee replacements in Calgary, Alberta, Canada K. Mponponsuo et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.217
19. An In Vitro Study to Assess the Best Strategy for the Chemical Debridement of Periprosthetic Joint Infection M. Márquez-Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101507
20. Preoperative and postoperative risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection in primary total hip arthroplasty: A 1-year experience G. Tella et al. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i10.903
21. A Review of Surgical Irrigation Solutions for Infection Prevention in Orthopaedic Surgery M. Chambers & S. Namdari https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00158
22. Balancing Scalpel and Antibiotics: A Modern Approach to Bone and Joint Infection Management T. Torres et al. https://doi.org/10.65332/rpdi.v20.138
23. Quality of life and therapeutic adherence in patients treated for an orthopedic hardware infection: A prospective observational study B. Derosais et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104976
24. Effects of Vancomycin/Tobramycin-Doped Ceramic Composite (Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite–Vancomycin/Tobramycin–Polymeric Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate) in a Rat Femur Model Implanted With Contaminated Porous Titanium Cylinders F. Aboona et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.076
25. Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty M. Kew et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.012
26. Microbiology, Treatment, and Postoperative Outcomes of Gram-Negative Prosthetic Joint Infections—A Systematic Review of the Literature M. Gonzalez et al. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01203
27. Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections A. Siddiqi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-189-2021
28. Timing of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection H. Keemu et al. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.25.00946
29. Do Antibiotic-Loaded Calcium Sulfate Beads Improve Outcomes After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention? A Matched Cohort Study T. Tarity et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.01.023
30. A standardized surgical technique for DAIR improves treatment success rates in acute periprosthetic knee infection G. Sánchez‐Rosenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70350
31. Current Status and Perspectives of Diagnosis and Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S457644
32. Effect of a multidisciplinary team on the treatment of hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: a single-centre study of 154 infections M. Vuorinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2021.1925341
33. 1.5-Stage Versus 2-Stage Exchange Total Hip Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Comparison of Survivorships, Reinfections, and Patient-Reported Outcomes J. Nace et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.072
34. Efficacy of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Joint Infections Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study A. Shaik et al. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84591
35. Antimicrobial TiO2 nanocomposite coatings for surfaces, dental and orthopaedic implants V. Kumaravel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129071
36. Enhancing Antibacterial Performance and Biocompatibility of Pure Titanium by a Two-Step Electrochemical Surface Coating S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c10032
37. Management strategies for prosthetic joint infection: long-term infection control rates, overall survival rates, functional and quality of life outcomes T. Karachalios & G. Komnos https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210008
38. Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Prescribed Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A 1:4 Case Control Matched Study T. Humphrey et al. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2022.261
39. Preparation of a composite coating of bimodal TiO2 nanotubes with deposited Ag nanoparticles and its biological performance W. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130710
40. Early and Accurate Pathogen Identification Based on mNGS: Key to Timely Therapy for Mycoplasma Prosthetic Joint Infection Z. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70069
41. The stability of Staphylococcal bacteriophages with commonly used prosthetic joint infection lavage solutions J. Doub et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25731
42. Enzymes-enhanced antibiotic therapy reduces biofilms to undetectable levels in an implant-associated infection model R. Buzisa Mbuku et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00910-2
43. Outcomes of Concurrent Endocarditis and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Case Series of 16 Patients T. Humphrey et al. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24139
44. Genomic Insights into Host Susceptibility to Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Comprehensive Literature Review J. Lizcano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122486
45. Differences and Similarities in Hip and Knee Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Primary Arthroplasty Treated with Irrigation and Debridement: An International, Multicenter Retrospective Study A. Abedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2026.04.093
46. Mid-term results after DAIR for patients with acute periprosthetic joint infections of the hip or knee A. Zellner et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06117-z
47. Utilizing Bacteriophages to Manage Biofilm Infections on Medical Devices: A Systematic Review N. Rai et al. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.19.2.31
48. Outcomes After Successful Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention Therapy for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty M. Van Engen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.015
49. Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Treatment of Early Infections after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty C. Hulleman et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155026
50. Multidisciplinary Approach to Multiple Multiresistant Agent Infection of Instrumented Spine Surgery F. Xará-Leite et al. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.21.00472
51. The Effect of Prosthetic Joint Infection on Work Status and Quality of Life: A Multicenter, International Study I. Shichman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.015
52. 2025 ICM: Wound Drainage S. Mortazavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.10.090
53. Higher 1-year risk of implant removal for culture-positive than for culture-negative DAIR patients following 359 primary hip or knee arthroplasties J. van Eck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-143-2022
54. Prevention and antibiotic therapy of hip periprosthetic joint infections F. GIOVANNENZE et al. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8469.21.04185-7
55. The role of antibiotic calcium sulfate beads in acute periprosthetic knee infection: a retrospective cohort study G. Piovan et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00139-2
56. What Is the Optimal Irrigation Solution in the Management of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections? A. Siddiqi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.032
57. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review U. Longo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.003
58. Success rate of single versus multiple debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis L. Salman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04091-6
59. The draining surgical wound post total hip and knee arthroplasty: what are my options? A narrative review R. Almeida et al. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200054