31 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Antibiotics and cement: what I need to know? A. Pellegrini & V. Suardi https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700020915463
2. Cement Loaded With High-Dose Gentamicin and Clindamycin Reduces the Risk of Subsequent Infection After One-Stage Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Exchange for Periprosthetic Infection: A Preliminary Study J. Jenny et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.014
3. Poly(DL-lactic acid) scaffolds as a bone targeting platform for the co-delivery of antimicrobial agents against S. aureus-C.albicans mixed biofilms M. Zegre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121832
4. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is associated with a lower risk of revision following primary cemented total knee arthroplasty S. Jameson et al. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0196.R1
5. Incidence of staphylococcus aureus infections after surgical interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis B. Elezbawy et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2025.2569833
6. In vitro evaluation of methylglyoxal as an antibacterial additive to bone cement M. Bohn et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1661383
7. Minimum 5 years’ follow-up after gentamicin- and clindamycin-loaded PMMA cement in total joint arthroplasty H. Abdelaziz et al. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000895
8. Antimicrobials in polymethylmethacrylate: from prevention to prosthetic joint infection treatment: basic principles and risk of resistance M. Sabater-Martos et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00166-7
9. Elution kinetics and antimicrobial efficacy of high-dose gram-negative antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement: an in vitro and in vivo study J. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-026-05322-y
10. A Low Rate of Periprosthetic Infections after Aseptic Knee Prosthesis Revision Using Dual-Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement B. Blersch et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091368
11. Antibiotic Choice: The Synergistic Effect of Single vs Dual Antibiotics N. Mohamed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.002
12. Single versus dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement in hip fracture arthroplasty: a cohort study of 56,434 hip arthroplasties from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register S. Yoon et al. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46527
13. Impact of Multi-Drug–Resistant Pneumonia on Outcomes of Critically Ill Trauma Patients I. Rai et al. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2019.240
14. Efficacy and Safety of Dual vs Single Antibiotic-Loaded Cement in Bone Fracture Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis E. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75208
15. Activation of Pregnane X Receptor Sensitizes Mice to Hemorrhagic Shock–Induced Liver Injury Y. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30691
16. High-dose dual-antibiotic loaded cement for hip hemiarthroplasty in the UK (WHiTE 8): a randomised controlled trial N. Agni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00962-5
17. Is Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement More Effective and Cost-Efficient Than a Single Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement to Reduce the Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty? P. Sanz-Ruiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.045
18. The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry D. Szymski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12040732
19. Is Gentamicin Elution Influenced by the Timing of Antibiotic Addition to the Bone Cement? An In Vitro Study on Articulating Hip Spacers G. Cacciola et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5030066
20. Dual‐ vs. Single‐Antibiotic Loaded Cement for Hip Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis C. Mohammed et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70056
21. Patients at a high risk of PJI: Can we reduce the incidence of infection using dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement? C. Berberich et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00142-7
22. Use of local treatment in managing infections: Focus on antimicrobial locks, beads, and cement W. Kufel & J. Kufel https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae264
23. Meropenem-loaded Cement Is Effective in Preventing Gram-negative Osteomyelitis in an Animal Model J. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002364
24. High-dose dual-antibiotic loaded bone cement in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty S. Tarabichi & J. Parvizi https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01089-9
25. A randomized clinical trial of low dose single antibiotic-loaded cement versus high dose dual antibiotic-loaded cement in patients receiving a hip hemiarthroplasty after fracture: A protocol for the WHiTE 8 COPAL study N. Agni et al. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.22.BJO-2020-0174
26. Properties of Orthopaedic Cements Biomechanically Little Affected by Exceptional Use of Liquid Antibiotics H. Sophie et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12911
27. Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip A. Bureau et al. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.22.00020
28. High-dose dual antibiotic cement for hip hemiarthroplasty L. Farrow et al. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1364.R1
29. Risk assessment of antibiotic resistance development by antibiotic-loaded bone cements: is it a clinical concern? C. Berberich & P. Sanz-Ruiz https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180104
30. Risk for re-revision and type of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in hip or knee arthroplasty revisions: report of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register P. Bos et al. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.18645
31. Dual antibiotic loaded bone cement in patients at high infection risks in arthroplasty: Rationale of use for prophylaxis and scientific evidence C. Berberich et al. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i3.119