Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-73-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-73-2025
Original full-length article
 | 
24 Mar 2025
Original full-length article |  | 24 Mar 2025

Comparison of surgical treatments for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections using the desirability of outcome ranking in a prospective multicentre study

Brenton P. Johns, Mark R. Loewenthal, David C. Dewar, Laurens A. Manning, and Joshua S. Davis

Viewed

Total article views: 255 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
208 42 5 255 9 4 3
  • HTML: 208
  • PDF: 42
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 255
  • Supplement: 9
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 253 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 253 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
The desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) combines joint function, infection cure and mortality into one outcome. Using the DOOR, we describe patient outcomes after prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment; moreover, debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is compared with two-stage exchange. Infections were classified as early (≤ 90 d post-arthroplasty) or late (> 90 d post-arthroplasty). For early PJI, DAIR was superior to two-stage exchange, whereas two-stage revision was superior to DAIR for late PJI.
Share