Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-285-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-285-2025
Original full-length article
 | 
12 Aug 2025
Original full-length article |  | 12 Aug 2025

Inadequate empirical antibiotics following debridement for orthopedic infections do not increase therapy failures

Steven Mark Maurer, Marc Simon Maurer, Marc Schmid, Stefani Dossi, Lucienne Gautier, Aileen Elizabeth Boyd, Mazda Farshad, and Ilker Uçkay

Viewed

Total article views: 114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
95 16 3 114 0 0
  • HTML: 95
  • PDF: 16
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 114
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 114 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary

Empirical antibiotics should target likely pathogens if stewardship is followed, yet broader coverage is often used in orthopedic infections due to fear of failure. This retrospective case-control study examined surgically managed orthopedic infections, comparing accurate and inaccurate empirical antibiotic choices. Delays in switching to targeted antibiotics did not impact outcomes. Broad-spectrum regimens offered no advantage, supporting narrower choices for mild to moderate infections.

Share